Start the shift knowing what to fix first.
Reactive maintenance means the machine decides your day. The shift list here is ranked by risk, each job already shows whether the part is on the shelf, and the checklist travels with you on a tablet instead of on a clipboard that never comes back.
- 90 m
CD-04Replace drive bearing
Critical alert, 87% confidence
In stock after reorder
- 30 m
AC-03Change air filter element
High alert, restriction rising
9 on hand
- 20 m
PU-05Inspect seal weep
Watch item, 61%
2 on hand, at minimum
- 45 m
LINE2Lubrication round
Routine PM, due today
Not applicable
The daily difference
Less firefighting. More finishing.
Before
- Job list decided by whatever broke overnight
- Walk to the store, find the part missing, walk back
- Same fault on the same machine every few months
- Paper job cards that never reach the asset history
With Indussbz
- Queue ranked by risk and criticality before the shift starts
- Part availability shown on the job, reserved when flagged
- Repeat faults linked so the root cause becomes obvious
- Completion recorded on the device, written to the asset record
On the floor
Designed for gloves, noise and poor signal.
Screens a technician uses standing next to a running machine need large targets, few words and no dependency on a stable connection.
Risk-ranked queue
Jobs ordered by alert severity, asset criticality and how long a deferral has been running.
Part shown on the job
On-hand quantity, bin location and reservation status appear before you walk to the store.
Checklists with sign-off
Isolation steps, torque values and inspection points recorded as you go, with photographs where useful.
Works offline
Lists and checklists cache on the device and sync when the tablet finds the network again.
Asset history in hand
The last three interventions on that machine, including what was replaced and by whom.
Honest time estimates
Durations are built from your own completion times, so the plan reflects how long jobs really take.
The technician's call still counts
The platform suggests. You decide.
An alert is evidence, not an instruction. Confirm it, reject it, or record what you actually found - and that outcome feeds back into how the pattern is weighted next time.
- Reject an alert with a reason and it stops repeating
- Record the real fault when it differs from the prediction
- Add findings that no sensor would catch, in your own words
- Defer a job with a note so the decision is visible, not hidden
- Alert outcome
- Confirmed
- Found
- Drive-end bearing, outer race pitting
- Parts consumed
- BRG-6205-2RS x 1
- Time taken
- 80 m against 90 m planned
- Downtime class
- Planned stop
Technician note: coupling alignment also out by a small margin, corrected. Recommend checking the same on CD-07.
Written to asset history and MTBF recalculated